System and method for monitoring and quality evaluation of perishable food items

ABSTRACT

This disclosure relates generally to a system and method for monitoring and quality evaluation of perishable food items in quantitative terms. Current technology provides limited capability for controlling environmental conditions surrounding the food items in real-time or any quantitative measurement for the degree of freshness of the perishable food items. The disclosed systems and methods facilitate in quantitative determination of freshness of food items by utilizing sensor data and visual data obtained by monitoring the food item. In an embodiment, the system utilizes a pre-trained CNN model and a RNN model, where the pertained CNN model is further fine-tined while training the RNN model to provide robust quality monitoring of the food items. In another embodiment, a rate kinetic based model is utilized for determining reaction rate order of the food item at a particular post-harvest stage of the food item so as to determine the remaining shelf life thereof.

PRIORITY CLAIM

This U.S. patent application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 to:India divisional patent Application No. 202022005149 filed on Feb. 06,2020, which further claims priority from India provisional ApplicationNo. 201921004783, filed on Feb. 06, 2019. The entire contents of theaforementioned application are incorporated herein by reference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The disclosure herein generally relates to monitoring and evaluationsystems, and, more particularly, to system and method for monitoring andquality evaluation of perishable food items.

BACKGROUND

Amongst various food items used and consumed in various industries,perishable food items forms a huge percentage. Such food items, if notmanaged properly, for instance during transport and/or storage may posemajor health hazards subjected to consumption of partially or fullyspoiled food products such as dairy products, fish, meat raw vegetablespost-harvest fruits, and so on. It is highly essential to monitorperishable food item/commodities over a period of time to ensurequality.

Sometimes consumption of certain perishable food items may be unhealthydue to change in certain composition of the food item, change in certainphysical parameters like temperature, pressure, humidity, emission ofsome harmful gasses like methane, ethylene, ammonia etc. change in pH,increase of CO2 content therein, change in moisture content therein, andso on. The degradation may not be visible via change in color or by merevisual observation.

SUMMARY

Embodiments of the present disclosure present technological improvementsas solutions to one or more of the above-mentioned technical problemsrecognized by the inventors in conventional systems. For example, in oneembodiment, a method for monitoring and quality evaluation of perishablefood items is provided. The system includes obtaining input datacomprising visual data and sensory data associated with a food itemenclosed in a networked framework, via one or more hardware processors,wherein the visual data and sensory data are time-series data andcomprises characteristics indicative of freshness of the food item at aplurality of lifecycle stages. Further the method includes obtaining,via the one or more hardware processors, a food freshness vector usingthe input data and one or more machine learning (ML) models. Obtainingthe food freshness vector includes generating, by a pre-trainedconvolution neural network (CNN) model, a first vector embedding of thefood item at a time-instance using the visual data, the pre-trained CNNmodel trained as a generic food item classifier using a plurality ofimages comprising the visual data of a plurality of food items for aplurality of time-instances associated with the plurality of lifecyclestages. Further, the method includes concatenating the first vectorembedding and a second vector embedding to obtain a concatenated vectorembedding at the time-instance. The second vector embedding is obtainedfrom the sensory data of the input data. Also the method includesobtaining, by fine-tuning the pre-trained CNN model along with thetraining of a Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), a third vector embeddingassociated with the food item at the time instance using theconcatenated vector embedding, wherein the third vector embeddingindicative of a lifecycle stage of the food item at the time instance,wherein the RNN is trained using the time series data of the visual dataand the sensory data of the food item aging over a period of time.Moreover, the method includes comparing, using vector similaritymeasure, the food freshness vector of the food item at the lifecyclestage from amongst the plurality of lifecycle stages with a digitalsignature of the food item, via the one or more hardware processors,wherein the food freshness vector of the food item obtained by feedingthe visual input of the food item to the fine-tuned CNN model, andwherein the digital signature of the food item is a digitized vectorrepresentation of the food item, indicative of freshness of the fooditem at a target lifecycle stage.

In another aspect, a system for monitoring and quality evaluation ofperishable food items is provided. The system includes one or morememories; and one or more first hardware processors, the one or morefirst memories coupled to the one or more first hardware processors,wherein the one or more first hardware processors are configured toexecute programmed instructions stored in the one or more firstmemories, to obtain input data comprising visual data and sensory dataassociated with a food item enclosed in a networked framework, whereinthe visual data and sensory data are time-series data and comprisescharacteristics indicative of freshness of the food item at a pluralityof lifecycle stages. The one or more first hardware processors areconfigured to obtain a food freshness vector using the input data andone or more machine learning (ML) models. The one or more first hardwareprocessors are configured to obtain the food freshness vector bygenerating, by a pre-trained convolution neural network (CNN) model, afirst vector embedding of the food item at a time-instance using thevisual data, the pre-trained CNN model trained as a generic food itemclassifier using a plurality of images comprising the visual data of aplurality of food items for a plurality of time-instances associatedwith the plurality of lifecycle stages. The one or more first hardwareprocessors are further configured to concatenate the first vectorembedding and a second vector embedding to obtain a concatenated vectorembedding at the time-instance, wherein the second vector embeddingobtained from the sensory data of the input data. Further, the one ormore first hardware processors are configured to obtain, by fine-tuningthe pre-trained CNN model along with the training of a Recurrent NeuralNetwork (RNN), a third vector embedding associated with the food item atthe time instance using the concatenated vector embedding, wherein thethird vector embedding indicative of a lifecycle stage of the food itemat the time instance, wherein the RNN is trained using the time seriesdata of the visual data and the sensory data of the food item aging overa period of time. Furthermore, the one or more first hardware processorsare configured to compare, using vector similarity measure, the foodfreshness vector of the food item at the lifecycle stage from amongstthe plurality of lifecycle stages with a digital signature of the fooditem, wherein the food freshness vector of the food item obtained byfeeding the visual input of the food item to the fine-tuned CNN model,and wherein the digital signature of the food item is a digitized vectorrepresentation of the food item, indicative of freshness of the fooditem at a target lifecycle stage.

In another aspect, a non-transitory computer readable medium for methodfor monitoring and quality evaluation of perishable food items isprovided. The method includes obtaining input data comprising visualdata and sensory data associated with a food item enclosed in anetworked framework, via one or more hardware processors, wherein thevisual data and sensory data are time-series data and comprisescharacteristics indicative of freshness of the food item at a pluralityof lifecycle stages. Further the method includes obtaining, via the oneor more hardware processors, a food freshness vector using the inputdata and one or more machine learning (ML) models. Obtaining the foodfreshness vector includes generating, by a pre-trained convolutionneural network (CNN) model, a first vector embedding of the food item ata time-instance using the visual data, the pre-trained CNN model trainedas a generic food item classifier using a plurality of images comprisingthe visual data of a plurality of food items for a plurality oftime-instances associated with the plurality of lifecycle stages.Further, the method includes concatenating the first vector embeddingand a second vector embedding to obtain a concatenated vector embeddingat the time-instance. The second vector embedding is obtained from thesensory data of the input data. Also the method includes obtaining, byfine-tuning the pre-trained CNN model along with the training of aRecurrent Neural Network (RNN), a third vector embedding associated withthe food item at the time instance using the concatenated vectorembedding, wherein the third vector embedding indicative of a lifecyclestage of the food item at the time instance, wherein the RNN is trainedusing the time series data of the visual data and the sensory data ofthe food item aging over a period of time. Moreover, the method includescomparing, using vector similarity measure, a food freshness vector ofthe food item at the lifecycle stage from amongst the plurality oflifecycle stages with a digital signature of the food item, via the oneor more hardware processors, wherein the food freshness vector of thefood item obtained by feeding the visual input of the food item to thefine-tuned CNN model, and wherein the digital signature of the food itemis a digitized vector representation of the food item, indicative offreshness of the food item at a target lifecycle stage.

In yet another embodiment, a processor-implemented is method. The methodincludes obtaining a rate kinetic data associated with a food itemenclosed in a networked framework, via one or more hardware processors.wherein the rate kinetic data comprises a time-series data having aplurality of attributes indicative of freshness of the food item.Further the method includes selectively partitioning the rate kineticdata into a plurality of post-harvest lifecycle stages of the food itembased on a reaction rate order associated with one or more timeintervals of each of the plurality of post-harvest lifecycle stages, viathe one or more hardware processors, wherein the reaction rate orderassociated with the one or more time intervals of each of the pluralityof post-harvest lifecycle stages is determined by a trained rate kineticmodel. Furthermore, the method includes estimating, based at least onthe reaction rate order associated with the one or more time intervalsand the plurality of attributes, a plurality of values of shelf-life ofthe food item during each of the one or more time intervals, via the oneor more hardware processors. Also, the method includes aggregating, viathe one or more hardware processors, a set of values of the shelf-lifefrom amongst the plurality of values of the shelf-life corresponding toeach attribute of the plurality of attributes. Also, the method includesselecting, from amongst the set of values of the shelf-life, a minimumvalue of shelf-life as the food freshness value of the food item.

In still another embodiment, a system for monitoring and qualityevaluation of perishable food items is provided. The system includes oneor more memories; and one or more first hardware processors, the one ormore first memories coupled to the one or more first hardwareprocessors, wherein the one or more first hardware processors areconfigured to execute programmed instructions stored in the one or morefirst memories, to obtain a rate kinetic data associated with a fooditem enclosed in a networked framework, wherein the rate kinetic datacomprises a time-series data having a plurality of attributes indicativeof freshness of the food item. Further, the one or more hardwareprocessors are further configured by the instructions to selectivelypartition the rate kinetic data into a plurality of post-harvestlifecycle stages of the food item based on a reaction rate orderassociated with one or more time intervals of each of the plurality ofpost-harvest lifecycle stages, wherein the reaction rate orderassociated with the one or more time intervals of each of the pluralityof post-harvest lifecycle stages is determined by a trained rate kineticmodel. Furthermore, the one or more hardware processors are furtherconfigured by the instructions to estimate, based at least on thereaction rate order associated with the one or more time intervals andthe plurality of attributes, a plurality of values of shelf-life of thefood item during each of the one or more time intervals. Also the one ormore hardware processors are further configured by the instructions toaggregate a set of values of the shelf-life from amongst the pluralityof values of the shelf-life corresponding to each attribute of theplurality of attributes. Also, the one or more hardware processors arefurther configured by the instructions select, from amongst the set ofvalues of the shelf-life, a minimum value of shelf-life as the foodfreshness value of the food item.

In still another aspect, a non-transitory computer readable medium formethod for monitoring and quality evaluation of perishable food items isprovided. The method includes obtaining a rate kinetic data associatedwith a food item enclosed in a networked framework, wherein the ratekinetic data comprises a time-series data having a plurality ofattributes indicative of freshness of the food item. Further the methodincludes selectively partition the rate kinetic data into a plurality ofpost-harvest lifecycle stages of the food item based on a reaction rateorder associated with the one or more time intervals of each of theplurality of post-harvest lifecycle stages, wherein the reaction rateorder associated with the one or more time intervals of each of theplurality of post-harvest lifecycle stages is determined by a trainedrate kinetic model. Furthermore, the method includes estimating, basedat least on the reaction rate order associated with the one or more timeintervals and the plurality of attributes, a plurality of values ofshelf-life of the food item during each of the one or more timeintervals. Also, the method includes aggregating a set of values of theshelf-life from amongst the plurality of values of the shelf-lifecorresponding to each attribute of the plurality of attributes. Also,the method includes selecting, from amongst the set of values of theshelf-life, a minimum value of shelf-life as the food freshness value ofthe food item

It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description andthe following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory onlyand are not restrictive of the invention, as claimed.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute apart of this disclosure, illustrate exemplary embodiments and, togetherwith the description, serve to explain the disclosed principles.

FIG. 1 illustrates a network environment implementing a system formonitoring and quality evaluation of perishable food items, according toan embodiment of the present subject matter.

FIG. 2 is a process flow for monitoring and quality evaluation ofperishable food items is disclosed, in accordance with an exampleembodiment

FIG. 3 is a functional block diagram of a system for monitoring andquality evaluation of perishable food items, in accordance with anexample embodiment.

FIG. 4 is an example representation of signal processing components andcircuitry of a system for monitoring and quality evaluation ofperishable food items, according to some embodiments of the presentdisclosure.

FIG. 5 illustrates an example of fine tuning a CNN model associated witha system for monitoring and quality evaluation of perishable food items,according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 6 illustrates an example flow diagram depicting a method formonitoring and quality evaluation of perishable food items, inaccordance with an example embodiment.

FIGS. 7A-7C illustrate an example scenario for monitoring and qualityevaluation of perishable food items and prediction of shelf lifethereof, according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 8 illustrates an example flow diagram depicting a method formonitoring and quality evaluation of perishable food items, inaccordance with another example embodiment.

FIGS. 9A-9B illustrates an example flow diagram depicting a method formonitoring and quality evaluation of perishable food items, inaccordance with another example embodiment.

FIGS. 10A-10G shows graphical representation of selectively partitioningrate kinetic data associated with monitoring of the food item inmultiple post-harvest life cycle stages, according to some otherembodiments of the present disclosure.

FIGS. 11A-11I illustrate an example scenario for monitoring and qualityevaluation of perishable food items and prediction of shelf lifethereof, according to some other embodiments of the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Exemplary embodiments are described with reference to the accompanyingdrawings. In the figures, the left-most digit(s) of a reference numberidentifies the figure in which the reference number first appears.Wherever convenient, the same reference numbers are used throughout thedrawings to refer to the same or like parts. While examples and featuresof disclosed principles are described herein, modifications,adaptations, and other implementations are possible without departingfrom the scope of the disclosed embodiments. It is intended that thefollowing detailed description be considered as exemplary only, with thetrue scope being indicated by the following claims.

Various conventional techniques are available for monitoring and qualityevaluation of perishable food items. The conventional technologiesavailable for said monitoring and quality evaluation involvessensing/monitoring based on a single parameter like food itemsurrounding temperature, odor or visual observation or pictorial changesor gasses emitted or by chemical changes observed over time. Currenttechnology, however, does not allow simultaneous sensing of orthogonalparameters over time. Herein, orthogonal parameters refer tostatistically independent parameters. Sensing of orthogonal parametersimplies that the sensed parameters that are used for prediction ofdegree of food freshness are independent of one another and mutuallyexclusive.

Typically, such sensing is done either at source or duringtransit/storage but there exist no provision for continuous foodmonitoring at source, during storage and in transit. Such conventionaltechnology is limited in a display capability to indicate food freshnessparameters to all the stakeholders in the food supply chain. Moreover,available systems have limited or no capability for controlling theenvironmental conditions surrounding the food items in real-time.Typical monitoring of perishable food items merely provides qualitativeanalysis but does not provide any quantitative measurement for thedegree of freshness of the perishable food items. Current techniques donot have provisions for online monitoring and prediction of remainingshelf life at a prior date and hence no provision exists for repurposingthe perishable item much before it starts degrading and hence reducewastage. Accordingly, an automated system for monitoring and qualityevaluation of perishable food items is important so as to monitorvarious mutually exclusive parameters periodically, and ascertain healthsafety.

Various embodiments of the present disclosure provide system and methodfor monitoring and quality evaluation of perishable food items.Particularly, the disclosed system is capable of predicting freshness ofperishable food items at source, during transit and storage by utilizinga continuous controlled monitoring technique. In an embodiment, thesystem includes a customized model specific to a given perishable fooditems. The system is capable of predicting food quality/freshnessagainst a standard of the given perishable food item based on the datamodel, the composition of the food item and stoichiometric equationsthat governs the stages of the food item post-harvest till the food itemis consumed or used for processing during the lifecycle thereof. Sincethe system is capable of predicting the food quality in quantitativeterms, it enables repurposing food and reducing food loss and foodwastage based on remaining shelf life.

In an embodiment, the disclosed system includes a multi-parameterintelligent model of the selected perishable food item to be monitored.The system combines explicitly collected sensor data along with implicitvisual characteristics associated with the perishable foods to determinefood freshness or perishable food item shelf life over time. In anembodiment, the model receives multiple sensory data as well as visualdata input from an integrated framework, and then determines freshnessof the perishable food items as a function of multiple varyingparameters. In an embodiment, the system generates a digital signaturefor an ideal stage of the perishable food item as a standardizationtechnique to determine freshness of the perishable food item. Thedigital signature of the food item is a digitized vector representationof the food item, indicative of freshness of the food item at a targetlifecycle stage. In an embodiment, the target lifecycle stage may be alifecycle stage of the food item. A detailed description of the abovedescribed system for monitoring of perishable food items is shown withrespect to illustrations represented with reference to FIGS. 1 through7C.

In another embodiment, a method and system are provided for monitoringand quality evaluation of perishable food items based on a rate kineticmodel. The rate kinetic model includes rate kinetic of zero order, firstorder and second order. The disclosed system is capable of monitoringthe rate kinetics (or rate of change of attribute data) of the food itemat any given time interval and based on the same determines the reactionrate order in said interval. The system further determines a shelf-lifeof the food item under consideration based on the reaction rate orderand attributes to predict the shelf-life of the food item. A detaileddescription of the above described system for monitoring of perishablefood items is shown with respect to illustrations represented withreference to FIGS. 1-4 and FIGS. 8-11I.

Exemplary embodiments are described with reference to the accompanyingdrawings. In the figures, the left-most digit(s) of a reference numberidentifies the figure in which the reference number first appears.Wherever convenient, the same reference numbers are used throughout thedrawings to refer to the same or like parts. While examples and featuresof disclosed principles are described herein, modifications,adaptations, and other implementations are possible without departingfrom the scope of the disclosed embodiments. It is intended that thefollowing detailed description be considered as exemplary only, with thetrue scope being indicated by the following claims.

Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly to FIG. 1 through11I, where similar reference characters denote corresponding featuresconsistently throughout the figures, there are shown preferredembodiments and these embodiments are described in the context of thefollowing exemplary system and/or method.

FIG. 1 illustrates a network environment 100 implementing a system 102for monitoring perishable food items, according to an embodiment of thepresent subject matter. The system 102 is capable of estimatingfreshness/quality of the perishable food items/shelf life as a functionof multiple mutually exclusive sensed parameters associated with theperishable food items, and hence enables not only the qualitativeanalysis but also quantitative estimate of the freshness of theperishable food item. Hereinafter, for the brevity of description, the‘perishable food items/commodities’ may be referred to as ‘food item’.

In an embodiment, the system 102 may receive sensory data and visualdata based on the monitoring of the food item from a networkedframework, for example networked framework. Herein, it will beunderstood that said networked framework is capable of incorporatingmultiple mutually exclusive sensors, including but not limited to, pHsensor, optical sensor, gas sensor (for instance, O₂, CO₂, NH₃, methane,ethylene, and so on), temperature sensor, humidity sensor, color sensor,NIR sensor with micro spectrophotometer, ultrasonic sensor, GSR sensor,and so on integrated inside a customized enclosure capable of periodic,synchronized data logging corresponding to the food item. Herein, theultrasonic sensor measures any new growth by using ultrasonic waves, NIRsensor with micro spectrophotometer obtains spectra of sub-micronlevels, the GSR sensor suitably modified as per requirements measuresminute, delicate changes with respect to skin resistance of theperishable item which perhaps mark the beginning of degradation andcannot be measures otherwise.

In an embodiment, the mutually exclusive sensors may be integrated in asmart plate. The aforementioned networked framework enables multivariatesensing and monitoring of perishable food items like fish, meat, dairyproducts, post-harvest fruits and other perishable food items. In anembodiment, the sensors may include a modular configuration, and hencemay be replaced based upon the food item. The food items may also beilluminated by various frequencies of light. In an embodiment, thedisclosed framework may be a modular framework where any existing sensorcan be removed or any new sensor can be plugged in as per requirements.Also, multiple sensors and multiple cameras may be installed inside acustom enclosure embodying the networked framework with parametervariation control such as, but not limited to, temperature, humidity,and so on to capture periodic changes in the food item from alldirections depending upon the requirements. Herein, it will beunderstood that the disclosed networked framework is capable ofautomatically activating only those sensors from amongst a plurality ofaforementioned sensors to which the food item responds. Depending on thechoice of the food item, one or more sensors can be invoked and thatmodel can be used for prediction of freshness of the food. For example,cheese may require pH sensor while fruits may require Ethylene and CO₂sensors for monitoring. The networked framework for monitoring the fooditems and capturing the sensory data and the visual data therefrom isfurther described in the Indian Patent application no. 201821040783titled, “Integrated Framework for Multimodal Sensing and Monitoring ofPerishable Items” and is incorporated herein by reference.

The system 102 includes an intelligent model that may be pre-trainedusing multi-variate, multi-parameter, multi-modal sensory as well asvisual data associated with food items. In real-time, the system 102receives the sensory data and the visual data from the integratednetworked framework monitoring the food item, and estimates a degree offreshness/quality therefrom by utilizing the intelligent model anddigital signature of the selected food item. Herein, it will beunderstood that the term ‘digital signature’ refers to a representationof an ideal or near ideal food item.

The networked framework allows generating a digital signature of aperishable food item at a stage, where it is ideal for use as far asfreshness in concerned. Such a digital signature can be used as astandard for evaluation of freshness of other food items to validate iftheir freshness is apt of its use.

Although the present disclosure is explained considering that the system102 is implemented on a server, it may be understood that the system 102may also be implemented in a variety of computing systems, such as alaptop computer, a desktop computer, a notebook, a workstation, acloud-based computing environment and the like. It will be understoodthat the system 102 may be accessed by multiple users through one ormore devices 106-1, 106-2 . . . 106-N, collectively referred to asdevices 106 hereinafter, or applications residing on the devices 106.Examples of the devices 106 may include, but are not limited to, aportable computer, a personal digital assistant, a handheld device, asmartphone, a tablet Computer, a workstation and the like. The devices106 are communicatively coupled to the system 102 through a network 108.

In an embodiment, the network 108 may be a wireless or a wired network,or a combination thereof. In an example, the network 108 can beimplemented as a computer network, as one of the different types ofnetworks, such as virtual private network (VPN), intranet, local areanetwork (LAN), wide area network (WAN), the internet, and such. Thenetwork 106 may either be a dedicated network or a shared network, whichrepresents an association of the different types of networks that use avariety of protocols, for example, Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP),Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP), and WirelessApplication Protocol (WAP), to communicate with each other. Further, thenetwork 208 may include a variety of network devices, including routers,bridges, servers, computing devices, storage devices. The networkdevices within the network 108 may interact with the system 102 throughcommunication links.

As discussed above, the system 102 may be implemented in a computingdevice 104, such as a hand-held device, a laptop or other portablecomputer, a tablet computer, a mobile phone, a PDA, a smartphone, and adesktop computer. The system 102 may also be implemented in aworkstation, a mainframe computer, a server, and a network server. In anembodiment, the system 102 may be coupled to a data repository, forexample, a repository 112. The repository 112 may store data processed,received, and generated by the system 102. In an alternate embodiment,the system 102 may include the data repository 112.

In an embodiment, the network environment 100 may be an IoT basedenvironment comprising various hardware and software elementscollectively configured to perform real-time data analytics in the smartcomputing environment, according to an exemplary embodiment of thedisclosure. The IoT based platform backend may include a cloud server,for example the server 104 connected to a database, for example, thedatabase 112. The system 100 further includes various IoT based devices,for example the devices 106 implemented on different smart devices suchas smart phone, a telematics device, and so on enabling real-timeanalytics of sensor data. The system further includes variousheterogeneous sensor devices, for example sensor devices 110-1, 110-2,110-N (hereinafter collectively referred to as sensor devices 110) andso on, placed in the vicinity of smart computing environment connectedwith various IoT based devices 106. Alternatively, said sensor devices110 may be embodied in the IoT based devices 106. Thus, the sensordevices 110 along with the IoT based devices 106 may collectively forman intelligent smart environment according to this exemplary embodiment.

Further, as illustrated in FIG. 1, the network environment 100 supportsvarious connectivity options such as BLUETOOTH®, USB, ZigBee and othercellular services. In an exemplary embodiment, the system 102 interfaceswith sensors 110 such as GPS, accelerometers, magnetic compass, audiosensors, camera sensors, and so on. Based on the data collected fromvarious sensors, the system 102 with the help of various hardware andsoftware platforms, collectively performs the task of scalable dataanalytics on the captured sensor data in any smart computingenvironment. The network environment enables connection of devices 106such as Smartphone with the server 104, and accordingly with thedatabase 112 using any communication link including Internet, WAN, MAN,and so on. In an exemplary embodiment, the system 102 is implemented tooperate as a stand-alone device. In another embodiment, the system 102may be implemented to work as a loosely coupled device to the smartcomputing environment. In an embodiment, the networked framework may beembodied in an enclosure in form of a closed chamber. An example of thechamber embodying the networked framework is described further withreference to FIG. 2.

Referring now to FIG. 2, a process flow for monitoring of perishablefood items is disclosed, in accordance with an example embodiment. Asdisclosed previously, the networked framework can be implemented forreal time analysis of degree of freshness/quality at source, duringstorage and at transit. Furthermore, the networked framework may be ableto predict the shelf life over the given conditions so that a feedbacksystem can be developed to either alter the environmental conditions ortake appropriate actions such as repurposing, transporting to a nearbylocation, and so on. Such quantitative analysis opens up avenues forrepurposing the perishable item and thereby reducing wastage.

In an embodiment, the framework may be embodied in an enclosure, forinstance an enclosure 202. The enclosure 202 may include multiple smartplates installed therein where environmental conditions at source orduring storage or at transit can be recreated. For example asillustrated the enclosure includes sensor suites (each suite havingmultiple sensors) such as sensor suites 204 a, 204 b, 204 c, and 204 d(hereinafter referred to as sensor suites 204), and multiple mediacapturing devices/sensors such as devices 206 a, 206 b, 206 c, 206 d(hereinafter referred to as devices 206). The sensors of the sensorsuites 204 along with the devices 206 captures sensory data and visualdata, respectively pertaining to the food item. Said extensivesynchronized data collection is followed by data filtration and datapreprocessing periodically.

Said data can be interfaced with PC (for example a computer 208) and/orBluetooth device (for example, a Bluetooth device 210) and/or Cloud (forexample, cloud 212) to form IoT platform, for example an IoT platform214. Such interfacing may be utilized for data analysis at 216. Saiddata analysis facilitate in finding data correlations (or data analysis)at 218, via machine learning (ML) and/or artificial intelligence (AI)algorithms to develop models, thereby leading to a customized digitaltwin for quantitative prediction of quality, degree of freshness,remaining shelf life of the perishable food item at 220. Herein, thedigital twin refers to a ML/AI based model that can quantitativelypredict the quality of the perishable food item. Herein, the frameworkmay be IoT enabled, thereby enabling storage of result 224 of the dataanalysis on a cloud 226 via for instance, Wi-Fi module and permitsremote data access via for instance, internet. In an embodiment, thedisclosed system for monitoring and quality estimation/prediction ofperishable food items is described further with reference to FIG. 3.

FIG. 3 illustrates a block diagram of a system 300, for example thesystem 102 (FIG. 1) for monitoring and quality estimation of theperishable food items, according to some embodiments of the presentdisclosure.

The system 300 includes or is otherwise in communication with one ormore hardware processors such as a processor 302, at least one memorysuch as a memory 304, and an I/O interface 306. The processor 302,memory 304, and the I/O interface 306 may be coupled by a system bussuch as a system bus 308 or a similar mechanism. The I/O interface 306may include a variety of software and hardware interfaces, for example,a web interface, a graphical user interface, and the like. Theinterfaces 306 may include a variety of software and hardwareinterfaces, for example, interfaces for peripheral device(s), such as akeyboard, a mouse, an external memory, and a printer. Further, theinterfaces 306 may enable the system 300 to communicate with otherdevices, such as web servers and external databases. The interfaces 306can facilitate multiple communications within a wide variety of networksand protocol types, including wired networks, for example, local areanetwork (LAN), cable, and so on, and wireless networks, such as WirelessLAN (WLAN), cellular, or satellite. For the purpose, the interfaces 306may include one or more ports for connecting a number of computingsystems with one another or to another server computer. The I/Ointerface 306 may include one or more ports for connecting a number ofdevices to one another or to another server.

The hardware processor 302 may be implemented as one or moremicroprocessors, microcomputers, microcontrollers, digital signalprocessors, central processing units, state machines, logic circuitries,and/or any devices that manipulate signals based on operationalinstructions. Among other capabilities, the hardware processor 302 isconfigured to fetch and execute computer-readable instructions stored inthe memory 304.

The memory 304 may include any computer-readable medium known in the artincluding, for example, volatile memory, such as static random accessmemory (SRAM) and dynamic random access memory (DRAM), and/ornon-volatile memory, such as read only memory (ROM), erasableprogrammable ROM, flash memories, hard disks, optical disks, andmagnetic tapes. In an embodiment, the memory 304 includes a plurality ofmodules 320 and a repository 340 for storing data processed, received,and generated by one or more of the modules 320. The modules 320 mayinclude routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, and soon, which perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract datatypes. The repository 340, amongst other things, includes a systemdatabase 342 and other data 344. The other data 344 may include datagenerated as a result of the execution of one or more modules in themodules 320. The repository 340 may further include a sensory data 346and image data 348 obtained during the monitoring of the food items, aswill be explained further in detail below.

The system 300 is configured to perform monitoring and qualityprediction of the perishable food items periodically. In an embodiment,the system 300 may receive sensory data 346 and image data 348 from theframework (for example, the framework explained with reference to FIG.2).

The system 300 preprocesses the sensory data 346 and the image data 348.In an embodiment, the one or more hardware processors may facilitatepreprocessing of the sensory data 346 and the image data 348, as isexplained further in description below.

Referring now to FIG. 4, an example representation of signal processingcomponents and circuitry 400 (hereinafter referred to as circuitry 400)of a system, for example the system 300 is illustrated according to someembodiments of the present disclosure. Herein, the signal processingcomponents and circuitry 400 is considered to be a part of the system300. In other words, in the present embodiment, the system 300 iscapable of preprocessing the sensory data and the visual/image datareceived from the framework by using the circuitry 400. However, it willbe understood that in alternate embodiments, the circuitry may not beembodied in the system 300, instead the circuitry 400 may be embodied inthe framework for preprocessing the visual/image data, and the system300 may receive said preprocessed data from the framework.

As illustrated, sensed raw signal from the sensors framework 401 may befed to a signal isolation circuit 402 to remove induced noise from thesensor signal(s), prevent ground looping in the communication networkand provide proper isolation between the sensor signals. A signalconditioning and data pre-processing module 404 performs signalconditioning, which involves filtering of unwanted frequencies, followedby voltage amplification by the preamplifier for further digitization bya data acquisition equipment and finally for generating analog todigital output data streams to be further processed by the hardwareprocessor(s) 406. Herein, the hardware processor 406 is similar to thehardware processor 302 (FIG. 3).

The quantified data can be used as an input for further applicationswhich require quantifiable data. For example, for the perishable fooditem being monitored, the corresponding quantified data can be used topredict degree of food quality over time, which may be useful forrepurposing of the food item and thereby reducing wastage of the food.

In an embodiment, the system 400 is used to qualify and quantify thedegree of food freshness. For instance, the environmental conditionsduring food transit and food storage may be recreated in a controlledchamber and the collected data over time is used to predict the degreeof freshness on the nth day. Moreover, based on the nth day data, thesystem can also predict the remaining shelf-life of the food product orpredict the degree of freshness to appear on the n+5th day. Accordingly,the food can be repurposed based on the remaining shelf life and foodwastage can be reduced. In an embodiment, the system analyses thecollected mutually exclusive synchronized data to develop a digital twin(or an intelligent model) with capability of predicting food freshnessover time, as described further with reference to FIG. 5.

Referring to FIG. 5 and FIG. 6 collectively, the monitoring and qualityestimation of the perishable food items is described in further detail.For example, FIG. 5 illustrates an architecture diagram for a system 500for monitoring and quality estimation of the perishable food items, inaccordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure. FIG. 6illustrates a flow diagram of a method for monitoring and qualityestimation of the perishable food items, in accordance with an exampleembodiment.

The system 500 may be an example of the system 102 (FIG. 1) or thesystem 300 (FIG. 3). The system 500 includes a machine learning modelthat may be developed as per the nature of the perishable food itemconsidering various parameters so as to serve as a basis for machineintelligence to achieve prediction with the capability to learn. In anembodiment, the machine learning model takes an input data including thesensory data as well as an image data captured by a high resolutioncamera feed as an input at 602 (FIG. 6). The input data is taken at aplurality of lifecycle stages of the food items. In an embodiment, theplurality of lifecycle stages may include the stages of the food itempost-harvest till the food item is consumed or used for processing. Forinstance, for a food item such as banana, the plurality of lifecyclestages may include post-harvest stages of the banana, till the banana isconsumed. Additionally or alternatively, the plurality of lifecyclestages of the banana may include stages till the banana is utilized forprocessing, for instance for making banana chips. In another examplescenario, the plurality of lifecycle stages may include stages postprocessing, for instance, till the time the banana chips can beconsumed.

The system 500 treats said input data as a time series data, where everytime-instance takes the sensory data 502 and visual input 504, capturedat a time instance in the life-time of a perishable food item, as aninput. The output of the ML model predicts a degree and/or index offreshness of the food item in terms of a food freshness vector at everytime instance (at 604 of FIG. 6), which may degrade as the timeprogresses. The food freshness vector of the food item can be obtainedby feeding the visual input of the food item to a fine-tuned CNN model.The model can be a Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), for example RNN model506 which takes into consideration the dependencies of prior timeinstances (t-1, t-2, . . . , 1) while predicting the output attime-instance t of the time series data. Taking the previoustime-instances into consideration ensures that the freshness value ofthe food item at time instance t is not only a function of the sensorydata and visual data at time t, but also takes the prior states intoaccount while making the prediction, thereby enabling the system 500 totake into consideration the rate of change of sensory values as well asvisual characteristics such as color, texture, and so on, whilepredicting the freshness of the food item at a time instance t.

The mathematical equations for specialized type of RNN networks calledLong Short-Term Memory Networks (LSTMs) are as follows:

f _(t)=σ_(g)(W _(f) x _(t) +U _(f) C _(t−1) +b _(f))

i_(t)=σ_(g)(W _(i) x _(t) +U _(i) c _(t−1) +b _(i))

o_(t)=σ_(g)(W _(o) x _(t) +U _(o) c _(t−1) +b _(o))

c_(t)=f_(t)○c_(t−1)+i_(t)○σ_(c)(W_(c)x_(t)+U_(c)c_(t−1)+b_(c))

h _(t) =o _(t)○σ_(h)(c _(t))

-   -   where x_(t) is the input to the model at time instance t.    -   c_(t) is the cell state of the model, which captures the history        and    -   h_(t) is the output of the hidden state at time instance t.

Herein, it will be noted that during training time of the ML model, theoutput from the RNN model is compared with the freshness index/quotientat time t, where freshness index/quotient refers to a label provided byan expert, to determine the loss of the model at time t. This loss maybe back-propagated to update the weight (W_(s)) and bias (b_(s)) termsof the model.

Prior to feeding the visual data/input, which includes a trainingdataset comprising food images captured by a high resolution camera, tothe RNN model, said food images are fed to a pre-trained ConvolutionNeural Networks (CNN). The CNN network extracts features from the imagesusing a technique called transfer learning. Using the training datasetof food images, the pre-trained CNN network generates the first vectorembedding for said food images at 606. The first vector embeddingprovides unique visual representations of the food items taking in toconsideration the low level image features such as color, texture, andso on; mid-level features such as shapes, edges, and so on; and highresolution features such as objects which are part of the food images.

A single weight shared CNN network can be used across the time instancesof the RNN model. Weight sharing allows the same parameters to beupdated using a back-propagated loss at each time instance.

For instance, at time instance t the first vector embedding representingimage feature vector is represented as it and the second vectorembedding representing sensory data is represented by as s_(t). Thefirst vector embedding is concatenated with the second vector embeddingto obtain a concatenated vector embedding at the time-instance t (at 608of FIG. 6). Thus, x_(t)=[i_(t),s_(t)] where, [, ] indicatesconcatenation of the first vector embedding and the second vectorembedding and x_(t) is the input to the t^(th) time instance of RNNnetwork.

Said pre-trained CNN network is fine-tuned while training the RNN modelwith the time series data. Fine-tuning involves using the weights andbiases of the pre-trained CNN network as the point of initialization andthen updating those further during training of the entire model(randomly initialized RNN model and pre-trained CNN model)back-propagating the loss computed at the output of the RNN network. Forexample, the CNN model is pre-trained on a generic food data as a simpleclassification model. Such a CNN model that is pre-trained on thegeneric data associated with the food items may hereinafter be referredto as a pretrained CNN model. The pre-trained CNN model is used in thesystem architecture 500. The same pre-trained CNN model is used acrossthe input time instances (for instance, t−1, t, t+1, and so on) of theRNN model. As a part of training of the RNN model, the pre-trained CNNmodel is fine-tuned, and a plurality of weights of the pre-trained CNNmodel are updated by the gradients obtained from each of the inputtime-instance of the RNN model. Herein, since the same pre-trained CNNmodel is used across the multiple input time-instances and during theprocess of training of the ML model, the CNN model is fine-tuned whenthe plurality of weights thereof are updated during the backpropagationstep, by the gradients obtained from each of the multiple inputtime-instance, the CNN model is called as shared weight CNN model.

Herein, it will be understood that the advantage of taking the visualinput along with the sensory data is two-fold: (i) Sensory dataexplicitly captures the parameters which are contributing towards foodfreshness, however there can be some unknown (implicit) visualparameters which may be contributing to depict the freshness of thefood. For example, black dots on banana or change of color of mango, andso on. By taking the image data along with the sensory data, the system500 enables capturing the implicit visual characteristics which arecontributing towards the freshness of the food. Rate of change of thesecharacteristics is captured by using a time series model (RNN). Thecombination of explicit characteristics captured through sensory dataand implicit characteristics modeled and captured using visual dataleads to enhanced accuracy in determining the freshness of food items.

Fine tuning of said shared weight CNN network during the training of MLmodel provides an updated visual representation (embedding) of the fooditem (image) at its output (it). Due to the process of fine-tuning,which has the objective of predicting the freshness of the food-item atevery time instance, the embedding generated through the fine-tuned CNNmodel takes into consideration the effect of the freshness prediction atthat as well as all prior time instances, for example, at time instancet−1, time-instance t, time-instance t+1, and so on. After training ofthe ML model along with fine-tuning of the underlying shared CNNnetwork, the CNN network separately can be used to provide embedding ofimages of food items. Said embedding may demonstrate the freshness ofthe food item, more specifically, the visual representations whichdepict freshness of the food item, for example, black dots on banana orchange of color in case of mangoes, etc. When this CNN model is fed withthe images which are marked as ‘ideal for use’ from freshnessperspective, vectorized representation at the output of the CNN modelprovides a digital signature of that food item from freshnessperspective. The average of multiple of such representations formultiple of images of ‘ideal’ food items defines the standardizeddigital signature depicting ideal freshness quotient. The embeddingsprovided by the trained CNN model for images of distinct food items canbe compared with this standardized representation using vectorsimilarity measures to depict their idealness for use from freshnessperspective.

An example scenario describing shelf life study of food items, andmathematical model therefor is described further with reference to FIGS.7A, 7B and 7C.

EXAMPLE SCENARIO

In an example scenario, the shelf life study of food items has beencarried out and mathematical models are developed to predict the shelflife of these food items. Example of the shelf life study performed withbanana is shown in FIG. 7A. As seen in FIG. 7A, bananas are stored atdifferent environmental conditions to mimic the variations intemperature and humidity during different seasons, different geographiesand different conditions in the storage house. The experiments wereperformed at 1) Temperature 20° C., Relative humidity (RH) 80% 2)Temperature 25° C., RH 75% 3) Temperature 18° C., RH 85% 4) Temperature18° C., RH 95%. It has been observed that the bananas stored at 18° C.and 95% RH have shown maximum shelf life among the bananas kept in otherenvironmental conditions. This was found as bananas when stored at lowertemperature and higher humidity conditions, respiration rate is less,the bananas ripens at a slower rate and hence has a larger shelf life.It has also been observed that the bananas stored at 25° C. and 75% RHhave shown minimum shelf life among the bananas kept in otherenvironmental conditions as they were kept at higher temperature andlesser humidity conditions. It was also observed, the shelf life of thebananas kept at 18° C. and 85% RH has a longer shelf life compared tobananas kept at 20° C. and 80% RH. However the bananas kept at 18° C.and 85% RH has a shorter shelf life compared to bananas kept at 18° C.and 95% RH due to lesser humidity conditions. The developed platform hasprovision to use the data based and Image based models to predict theshelf life of the food items. These models can predict the shelf life interms of at least one of the shelf life defining parameter such asweight loss, change in colour, change in texture, change in gaseousparameters sugar content and the quality of the processed food preparedfrom the agricultural food item. For example, the quality of chipsprepared from bananas stored at different conditions.

FIGS. 7B-7C illustrates experimental and predicted shelf life based onthe calculated respiration rate, ripening stage in accordance with theexample scenario.

Various embodiments disclose method and system for monitoring andquality evaluation of perishable food items. Freshness of perishablefood items and/or shelf-life thereof is determined as a function of manymultivariate, mutually exclusive varying parameters via an intelligentmodel. The system enables developing continuous controlled monitoringtechnique by recreating the environmental conditions present at source,during transit or storage, in the custom enclosed chamber to predictfreshness of perishable food items at source, during transit andstorage. The disclosed framework may be able of controlling theenvironmental conditions in the enclosed chamber containing food item tomaintain the favorable conditions surrounding the food items.

An important contribution of the disclosed embodiments is determinationof freshness of the food item in quantitative terms. In an embodiment,the quantitative determination of freshness of the food items is basedon receipt of sensor data as well as visual data pertaining to the fooditems. Inclusion of visual contents using CNNs fine-tuning providesupdated visual embedding of the food item, which is a vectorizedrepresentation of the food item that depicts visual freshnesscharacteristics thereof. In an embodiment, the disclosed system can beused to develop Internet of Things (IOT) platform, in which thesynchronized data output obtained at specified intervals can beinterfaced with cloud/Personal Computer (PC). The quantified data can bedisplayed on a mobile screen, iPad, tablets and so on, throughcloud/Wi-Fi module/gsm-module.

In another embodiment, the monitoring and quality evaluation of the ofperishable food items can be performed by a system incorporating a ratekinetic model, as described further with reference to FIGS. 8 through11N. For example, FIG. 8 illustrates an example flow diagram depicting amethod for monitoring and quality evaluation of perishable food items,in accordance with another example embodiment. FIGS. 9A-9B illustratesan example flow diagram depicting a method for monitoring and qualityevaluation of perishable food items, in accordance with another exampleembodiment. FIGS. 10A-10N illustrate an example scenario for monitoringand quality evaluation of perishable food items and prediction of shelflife thereof, according to some other embodiments of the presentdisclosure.

FIG. 8 illustrates an example flow-diagram of a method 800 formonitoring and quality evaluation of perishable food items, using thesystem described with reference to FIGS. 1-3, in accordance with exampleembodiments of the present disclosure. The steps of the method 800 ofthe present disclosure will now be explained with reference to thesystem 102 as depicted in FIG. 1 or the system 300 as depicted in FIG.3, and the steps of flow diagram as depicted in FIG. 8. The system102/300 includes one or more data storage devices or the memory 304operatively coupled to the processor(s) 302, and is configured to storeinstructions for execution of steps of the method 800 by theprocessor(s) 302.

Although process steps, method steps, techniques or the like may bedescribed in a sequential order, such processes, methods and techniquesmay be configured to work in alternate orders. In other words, anysequence or order of steps that may be described does not necessarilyindicate a requirement that the steps to be performed in that order. Thesteps of processes described herein may be performed in any orderpractical. Further, some steps may be performed simultaneously.

At 802, method 800 includes obtaining a rate kinetic data associatedwith a food item enclosed in a networked framework, via one or morehardware processors. In an embodiment, the rate kinetic data may includesensory data. In an embodiment, the rate kinetic data may include one ormore of weight of the food item, weight loss of the food item, moisturecontent in the food item, moisture loss during the storage,concentration of specific compound in the food item, and concentrationof specific gas such as Carbon dioxide (CO2), ethylene (C2H4,), ammonia(NH3) released by the food item. Additionally, the rate kinetic data mayinclude a visual data having images of the food item. The visual datamay be received based on the monitoring of the food item from thenetworked framework, for example networked framework 200 (FIG. 2). Forexample, in an scenario, sprouting may be as one of the attributes ofthe plurality of attributes that may be measured in terms of percentagearea covered on the food item. In such a scenario, the visual datapertaining to the sprouting of the food item may be obtained from imagesensors associated with the networked framework, and further may beutilized for shelf-life determination.

Herein, it will be understood that said networked framework (illustratedand described previously with reference to FIG. 2) is capable ofincorporating multiple mutually exclusive sensors, including but notlimited to, pH sensor, optical sensor, gas sensor (for instance, O₂,CO₂, NH₃, methane, ethylene, and so on), temperature sensor, humiditysensor, weighing sensor, color sensor, NIR sensor with microspectrophotometer, ultrasonic sensor, GSR sensor, and so on integratedinside a customized enclosure capable of periodic, synchronized datalogging corresponding to the food item. Herein, the ultrasonic sensormeasures any new growth by using ultrasonic waves, NIR sensor with microspectrophotometer obtains spectra of sub-micron levels, the GSR sensorsuitably modified as per requirements measures minute, delicate changeswith respect to skin resistance of the perishable item which perhapsmark the beginning of degradation and cannot be measured otherwise.

In an embodiment, said mutually exclusive sensors may be integrated in asmart plate embodying the networked framework 200. The aforementionednetworked framework 200 enables multivariate sensing and monitoring ofperishable food items like fish, meat, dairy products, post-harvestfruits, vegetables and other perishable food items. In an embodiment,the sensors may include a modular configuration, and hence may bereplaced based upon the food item. The food items may also beilluminated by various frequencies of light. In an embodiment, thedisclosed framework may be a modular framework where any existing sensorcan be removed or any new sensor can be plugged in as per requirements.Also, multiple sensors and multiple cameras may be installed inside acustom enclosure embodying the networked framework with parametervariation control such as, but not limited to, temperature, humidity,and so on to capture periodic changes in the food item from alldirections depending upon the requirements. Herein, it will beunderstood that the disclosed networked framework is capable ofautomatically activating only those sensors from amongst a plurality ofaforementioned sensors to which the food item responds. Depending on thechoice of the food item, one or more sensors can be invoked and thatmodel can be used for prediction of freshness of the food. For example,cheese may require pH sensor while fruits may require Ethylene and CO₂sensors for monitoring. The networked framework for monitoring the fooditems and capturing the sensory data and the visual data therefrom isfurther described in the Indian Patent application no. 201821040783titled, “Integrated Framework for Multimodal Sensing and Monitoring ofPerishable Items” and is incorporated herein by reference.

In an embodiment, the method includes collecting the visual data and thesensory data using at least one of an invasive and a non-invasivetechnique. The invasive techniques include use of laboratory methods tocalculate different food compositional parameters including at least oneof sugar, starch, fat, protein, vitamins and antioxidants. Thenon-invasive technique may, but are not limited to, use of non-invasivesensors, such as gas sensors, acoustics, optical sensors, near infraredsensor, and so on.

In an embodiment, the method 800 includes defining one or moreattributes that may be the parameters defining the shelf-life of thefood item. For example, a change in weight (g) may be defined as anattribute for determining shelf-life of the food item. In an embodiment,the rate of change of the attributes may be a time-series data and mayhereinafter be referred to as rate kinetic data for the purpose ofdescription of the disclosed embodiments.

In an embodiment, a profile for change in value of attribute with timefrom t=0 to t=n may be plotted, and after different step-intervals(t_(step)) or time intervals the value of attributes is collected. Here,n is the total number of time intervals under which data is collected.

In an embodiment, the disclosed method includes receiving the ratekinetic data, for example the sensory data and optionally the visualdata, from the integrated networked framework in real-time, andmonitoring the food item to further estimate a degree offreshness/quality/shelf-life of the food item therefrom. The methodutilizes a trained rate kinetic model and a plurality of attributesassociated with the shelf-life of the food-item. The trained ratekinetic model may be pre-trained using a training data includingmulti-variate, multi-parameter, multi-modal sensory as well as visualdata associated with the food items. In an embodiment, the training datamay be iteratively fitted on to reaction rate equations, for example, azero order, a first order and a second order reaction rate equations inthat order to obtain the trained rate kinetic model for the food item.

At 804, method 800 includes selectively partitioning the input data orthe rate kinetic data into a plurality of post-harvest lifecycle stagesof the food item based on a reaction rate order associated with one ormore time intervals of each of the plurality of post-harvest lifecyclestages. The reaction rate order associated with the one or more timeintervals refers to the reaction rate order followed in those one ormore time intervals of each of the plurality of post-harvest lifecyclestages, and is determined by the trained rate kinetic model. In anembodiment, the rate kinetic data is converted into the time-series datainto an integrated form of zero, first and second order rate reactionequations in a sequential order to obtain a plot of rate of change ofconcentration terms associated with the rate kinetic model. Herein, theconcentration terms for the zero order, the first order and the secondorder reactions may be (C0−C), In(C/Co), (1/C−1/C0), as will bedescribed further with reference to FIGS. 9A-9B. Herein, for a timeinterval t−t0, C represents the value of attribute at time t, and C0represents the value of attribute at time t0.

Further, a value of coefficient of determination is obtained from theplot of integral form of the zero, first and second order reactions inthe sequential order. The order of reaction is determined based on acomparison of the value of the coefficient of determination with athreshold value of the coefficient of determination. Herein, the orderof the reaction is indicative of a nature of reaction responsible forbiochemical changes in the food item during the post-harvest lifecyclestage of the food item. The selective partitioning of the rate kineticdata and determination of the order of reaction for each of the timeintervals is described further in detail with reference to theflow-diagram of FIGS. 9A-9B.

At 806, the method 800 includes estimating, based at least on thereaction rate order followed in the one or more time intervals and theplurality of attributes, a plurality of values of shelf-life of the fooditem during each of the one or more time intervals, via the one or morehardware processors. At 808, the method 800 includes aggregating a setof values of the shelf-life from amongst the plurality of values of theshelf-life associated with each attribute of the plurality ofattributes, via the one or more hardware processors. At 810, the method800 includes selecting, from amongst the set of values of theshelf-life, a minimum value of shelf-life as the food freshness value ofthe food item, via the one or more hardware processors. Herein, theorder of the reaction depicts the nature of the reaction responsible forbiochemical changes in the food item during said post-harvest stage ofthe food item. Said order of reaction may be utilized to identifyappropriate environmental conditions required during the storage of thefood items. For example, different reactions responsible for thebiochemical changes (e.g. weight loss in the present embodiment) aretranspiration and respiration. During the first stage of the pluralityof post-harvest life cycle stages of the food item, high value of rateconstant indicates the transpiration and the relatively lower rateconstant in the second stage indicates dominance of respiration rate inthat stage. Hence, in order to prevent the weight loss during firststage, there is a need to reduce the transpiration, which can beachieved by keeping the food item (for example, potato) in high relativehumidity environment, whereas during the second stage, in order toreduce the weight loss there is a need to reduce the respiration rate,which can be achieved by keeping the food item at low temperatures andhigh humidity. In another embodiment, the order of reaction may beutilized for determination of remaining shelf-life of the food item.

FIGS. 9A-9B illustrate an example flow-diagram of a method 900 formonitoring and quality evaluation of perishable food items, using thesystem described with reference to FIGS. 1-3, in accordance with exampleembodiments of the present disclosure. The steps of the method 900 ofthe present disclosure will now be explained with reference to thesystem 102 as depicted in FIG. 1 or the system 300 as depicted in FIG.3, and the steps of flow diagram as depicted in FIGS. 9A-9B. The system102/300 includes one or more data storage devices or the memory 304operatively coupled to the processor(s) 302, and is configured to storeinstructions for execution of steps of the method 800 by theprocessor(s) 302.

Although process steps, method steps, techniques or the like may bedescribed in a sequential order, such processes, methods and techniquesmay be configured to work in alternate orders. In other words, anysequence or order of steps that may be described does not necessarilyindicate a requirement that the steps to be performed in that order. Thesteps of processes described herein may be performed in any orderpractical. Further, some steps may be performed simultaneously.

As described previously with reference to FIG. 8, the attributesdefining the shelf-life of the food item, and values thereof aredeclared at 901. The rate kinetic data or rate of change of saidattributes with time is obtained in terms of time-varying data bymonitoring said attributes using the networked framework at 902.

The rate kinetic data is selectively partitioned into a plurality ofpost-harvest lifecycle stages of the food item based on a reaction rateorder followed in one or more time intervals of each of the plurality ofpost-harvest lifecycle stages at 903. For identification of post-harvestlifecycle stages of the food item, at an initial stage (or stage 1) at904, a count of stages is initialized to one. All the time series data(i.e. time vs attribute data) is selected at 905, and a dataset isdefined therefrom at 906. For example, a dataset having an initialpoint, intermediate points, and a final point is initialized. In anembodiment, the Initial point=Attribute value at time t=t_initial; theIntermediate points=Attribute value at time intervals betweent=t_initial to t=t_final varied at time interval of t_step; and theFinal point=Attribute value at t=t_final days may be initialized.

The dataset is selectively partitioned into a fixed number of logicalstages into a plurality of post-harvest lifecycle stages in a holisticmanner by understanding the reaction rate order it follows in thespecific time intervals, as will be described further. In an embodiment,the start time, the gap between two time intervals, and the final timeinterval may be initialized respectively as ‘t_initial’=Start time;tstep=the gap between two time intervals, t_final=the final timeinterval. For example, in one scenario, said attribute data may beinitialized as t_initial=0 days, t_step=1 days, t_final=n days.

At 907, the method 900 includes defining the required accuracy/fitnessof the rate kinetic model measured in terms of R². At 908, a thresholdvalue of coefficient of determination (R²) is defined. In an examplescenario, the threshold value of coefficient of determination (R²) isdefined as 0.99. At 909, the time-series data (namely, the rate ofchange of attribute C vs t data) is converted into an integrated form ofzero order, and a concentration term of integrated form of zero order(C₀−C) vs time is plotted. A straight line passing through origin is fitand the R² value is determined. At 910, it is determined whether R² isgreater than or equal to R² _(acceptable). If it is determined at 910that R² is greater than or equal to R² _(acceptable), then at 911, orderof the reaction=‘0’=zero order, and slope of line is determined as ‘m’and intercept as ‘p’. Further, at 912, the shelf life of the food itemis calculated by using equation, t_(s)=((C₀−C_(s))−p)/m, where C_(s) isthe value of attribute at the end of shelf life. At 913, final readingmay be recorded as Step=Step, Initial data Point=Attribute att=t_initial, Final data point=Attribute at t=t_final, Intermediate datapoints at t=t_step, Order of reaction=‘0’; Rate constant=slope of lineas ‘m’; Intercept=‘p’.

If it is determined at 910 that the value of coefficient ofdetermination R² is less than R² _(acceptable), then at 914, the C vs tdata is converted into an integrated form of first order, andconcentration term In(C/C₀) vs time is plotted. Further, a straight linepassing through origin is fitted and the R² value is determined. It isfurther determined at 915, whether R² is greater than or equal to R²_(acceptable). If it is determined at 915 that R² is greater than orequal to R² _(acceptable), then at 916, order of reaction=‘1’=Firstorder, the slope of line is determined as ‘m’ and the intercept isdetermined as ‘p’. Further, at 917, the shelf life of the food item iscalculated by using equation, t_(s)=((In(C₀/C_(s))−p)/m, where C_(s) isthe value of attribute at the end of shelf life. The method at 917 isfollowed by 913, where the final reading may be recorded, as describedabove.

If however, it is determined at 915 that R² is less than R²_(acceptable), then at 918, the C vs t data is converted into anintegrated form of second order. The concentration term of second order(1/C−1/Co) vs time is plotted, a straight line passing through origin isfitted, and the coefficient of determination R² value is determined.Further at 919, it is determined whether R² is greater than or equal toR² acceptable. If it is determined at 919 that R² is greater than orequal to R² acceptable, then at 920, order of reaction=‘2’=second order,the slope of line is determined as ‘m’ and the intercept is determinedas ‘p’. Further, at 921, the shelf life of the food item is calculatedby using equation, t_(s)=((1/C_(s)−1/C₀))−p)/m, where C_(s) is the valueof attribute at the end of shelf life. The method at 921 is followed by913, where the final reading may be recorded, as described above.

If however, at 919, it is determined that R² is less than R²_(acceptable), then R² _(acceptable) is equated to R² _(acceptable)−0.01at 922, followed by a determination at 923 (till the value of R²acceptable reaches to 0.95), where the threshold value of R²≥0.95. If itis determined at 923 that the threshold value of R² is greater than orequal to 0.95, then the method 900 follows from 910 again, where thevalue of coefficient of determination is updated and subsequent stepsare followed for identifying a post-harvest stage of the food item. Ifhowever, it is determined that the threshold value of the coefficient ofdetermination R² is less than 0.95, then at 924, Size of the data pointsis updated as nsize =nsize−1, t_initial=t_initial days, t_step=t_stepdays, and t_final=t_final−t_step days, and the dataset is defined at906. Thereafter, the method 900 follows from 906 again.

As described above, the method 900 from 912, 917, and 921 follows aftermethod at 925. At 925, it is determined whether all of the one or moretime intervals associated with a post-harvest life cycle stages of thefood item have been accessed/considered, i.e. t_final=n. If it isdetermined at 925 that all of the time-intervals have not beenconsidered, i.e. t_final is not equal to n, then at 926 the count ofstage is increased by one. At 926 the size of the data pointsnsize=n−t_final, t_initial=t_final days, t_step=t_step days, andt_final=n days. and the dataset is defined at 906. Thereafter the method900 follows from 906 again.

If however at 925 it is determined that all of the time-intervals havebeen considered, i.e. t_final=n, then at 928 the reaction order and ratekinetic parameters for each step are recorded at 928. For example, forStage 1, Data size (time interval, attribute value), reaction order,rate constant are recorded; for Stage 2, Data size (time interval,attribute value), reaction order, rate constant are recorded; and forStage n, Data size (time interval, attribute value), reaction order,rate constant are recorded.

Based at least on the reaction rate order followed in the one or moretime intervals and the plurality of attributes, a plurality of values ofshelf-life of the food item are determined during each of the one ormore time intervals. In an embodiment, a set of values of the shelf-lifeare from amongst the plurality of values of the shelf-life that areassociated with each attribute of the plurality of attributes, areaggregated. For example, the total shelf life of food item is determinedin terms of selected attribute (e.g. weight loss, moisture loss, etc.).Also, total Shelf life=ts_stage1+t_stage2+t_stage n.

Further at 929, it is determined whether the shelf life of food item isestimated in terms of all attributes. If it is determined at 929 thatthe shelf life of food item is not estimated in terms of all attributes,then the method 900 follows from 902 to collect the rate kinetic datafor the attributes. If however, it is determined at 929 that the shelflife of food item is estimated in terms of all attributes, then at 930the shelf life of selected food item is declared. At 810, method 800includes selecting, from amongst the set of values of the shelf-life, aminimum value of shelf-life as the food freshness value of the fooditem, as presented in the expression below:

Shelf life=minimum (Total shelf life_attribute 1, Total shelflife_attribute 2, . . . Total shelf life_attribute n)

An example illustrating determination of the plurality of post-harvestlifecycle stages of the food item is described further with reference toFIGS. 10A-10E, in accordance with an example embodiment of the presentdisclosure. In the present example scenario, said stages have beendetermined by taking an example of the food item, potato (varietyAtlanta), as shown in FIG. 10A. The potatoes are stored at differentenvironmental conditions for a number of days to mimic the variations intemperature in the storage house. During the time of storage, the weightof potatoes is monitored, as is shown in Table-I below.

TABLE I Time-series data of variation of food attribute with time TimeAttribute Number of days Weight of potatoes (g) 1 1225.2 2 1190.2 31164.6 4 1151.3 5 1137.0 6 1126.4 7 8 1112.0 9 1106.0 10 1101.7 111097.5 12 1093.0 13 1089.1 14 15 1082.7 16 1079.5 17 1076.8 18 1073.7 191071.5 20 1069 21 22 1064.7 23 1061.2 24 1057.8 25 1054.9 26 1049.7

At an initial stage (or stage 1), entire data, for example the datagiven in table-I is considered. Said data is plotted against time toobtain the rate kinetic data (or time series data), as shown in FIG.10A. As a next step, the C vs t data is converted into an integratedform of zero order, and the concentration terms of integrated form ofzero order (C−C₀) vs time graph is plotted. From the rate kinetic data,a zero order reaction rate equation is obtained, as illustrated in FIG.106(1). Moreover, a value of coefficient of determination is computed.For example, in the stage 1, where entire data is considered in onestage, the value of coefficient of determination (R²) is 0.8413 (FIG.10B(I)). In an embodiment, the value of coefficient of determination iscomputed by using the equation:

$R^{2} = \frac{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}\; \left( {y_{i} - {\hat{y}}_{i}} \right)^{2}}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}\; \left( {y_{i} - \overset{\_}{y}} \right)^{2}}$

Where y_(i) is the attribute value from time t=0 to t=n, ŷ_(i) is thepredicted value of the attribute and y is the mean of the actual foodattribute data

Herein, the value of R² is determined to be less than the thresholdvalue of coefficient of determination (which is 0.95). Hence as a nextstep, the C vs t data is converted into an integrated form of firstorder, and the In(C/C₀) vs time graph is plotted. A straight linepassing through origin is fit through the graph and the R² value isdetermined. The graph is illustrated in FIG. 106(II). As is seen formFIG. 106(II), the value of coefficient of determination is 0.89, whichis less than the threshold value. Hence, the C vs t data is convertedinto an integrated form of second order, and the (1/C−1/C_(O)) vs timeis plotted as shown in FIG. 106(III). A straight line passing throughorigin is fitted and again the R² value is computed. As seen from FIG.106(111), the value of R² is determined to be less than the thresholdsvalue of 0.95. Hence the dataset is reduced by one day (t_(step)=1) from26 days and checked for fit of integral form of zero, first and secondorder equation. One such case is shown in FIG. 10C(I), 10C(II) and10C(III), where integral form of zero, first and second order arechecked for their fit for dataset of 10 days (t−16 days). The value ofR² determined for integral form of zero, first and second order is foundto be 0.90, 0.91 and 0.92 respectively. As seen from FIG. 10C(III), thevalue of R² determined to be less than the thresholds value of 0.95.Hence the dataset is further reduced by one step (t_(step)=1) from 10days and checked for fit of integral form of zero, first and secondorder equation. One such case is shown in FIG. 10D, where integral formof zero order is checked for its fit for dataset of 5 days. The value ofR² determined is 0.96, which is found to be greater than the thresholdsvalue of 0.95.

As seen from FIG. 10B(III), the value of R² is greater than thethreshold value of R² and hence order of reaction is ‘0’, zero orderreaction. The data from t=0 to t=5 (t=n−1) is considered as the firststage; Further the data set is selected from t=n−1 (i.e 5 days) to n(i.e. 26 days) and tried to fit the integral form of zero, first andsecond order as described earlier. The one such case is shown in FIG.10C(I), where integral form of zero order is checked for its fit fordataset from 5 days to 26 days. The value of R² determined is 0.96,which is found to be greater than the thresholds value of 0.95. As seenfrom FIG. 10C(I), the value of R² is greater than the threshold value ofR2 and hence order of reaction is −‘0’, zero order reaction for the dataset from t=5 days to t=26 days. Hence the stage from time t=5 to t=26days is considered as second stage.

The use of zero order rate kinetics with specific rate constant for datafrom t=0 days to t−5 days is considered as stage 1 and the use of zeroorder reaction rate kinetics for data from t=5days to t=29 days isconsidered as stage 2. The multistage rate kinetic models (combinedfirst stage and second stage) is shown in FIGS. 10D-10F.

Herein, the multistage rate kinetics described with reference to FIGS.10A-10F was compared with single stage kinetics (illustrated withreference to FIG. 10A). The result of comparison is illustrated in FIG.10G. As is seen, the root mean square error (RMSE) for the Single stagerate kinetic model is determined to be 13.1 while the RMSE for themulti-stage rate kinetic model was determined to be 4.1.

In an embodiment, the root mean square error (RMSE) is computed by usingthe equation:

${RMSE} = \sqrt{\frac{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{i = N}\; \left( {{Predicted}_{i} - {Actual}_{i}} \right)^{2}}{N}}$

An example scenario describing shelf-life prediction of food items, andmathematical model therefor is described further with reference to FIGS.11A(I) -11I.

EXAMPLE SCENARIO

Referring now to FIGS. 11A(I)-11I, in an example scenario, the shelflife study of food items has been carried out and mathematical modelsare developed to predict the shelf life of these food items. Example ofthe shelf life study performed with potato is shown in FIG. 11A. As seenin FIG. 11A, potatoes are stored at different environmental conditionsto mimic the variations in temperature and humidity during differentseasons, different geographies and different conditions in the storagehouse. The experiments were performed at 1) Temperature 23° C., Relativehumidity (RH) 70% in presence of light 2) Temperature 20° C., RH 90% inabsence of light (dark condition), 3) Temperature 25° C., RH 40% inpresence of light 4) Temperature 10° C., RH 90% in absence of light(dark condition). It has been observed that the potatoes stored at 20°C. and 25° C. have shown very low shelf life as sprouting is observedafter 3 to 7 days. The potatoes stored in absence of light (dark)conditions have shown white sprouts whereas potatoes stored in lighthave shown green sprouts. The green colour sprouts contain the toxiccompound called solanine, which should be avoided for human consumption.The potatoes stored at lower temperature of 10° C. and higher relativehumidity (90%) have shown no sprouting for the studied period and henceshown longer shelf life. The developed platform has provision to use thephysics based, data based, rate kinetics based and Image based models topredict the shelf life of the food items. These models can predict theshelf life in terms of at least one of the shelf life defining parametersuch as moisture loss, sprout formation, sugar content and the qualityof the processed food prepared from the agricultural food item. Forexample, the quality of chips prepared from potatoes stored at differentconditions.

Food items continuously lose moisture to the environment and hence leadto loss in weight. The weight loss affects both freshness of the fooditem and food loss as that much amount of food is not utilized for thedesired use resulting into economic loss. Hence moisture loss is one ofthe important parameter that can be directly related with the degree offood freshness. Higher the moisture loss lower is the food freshness andso on. Table II in (FIG. 11B) shows the total weight loss from thepotatoes stored at two different environmental conditions 1) Temperature25° C., RH 40% in presence of light and 2) Temperature 10° C., RH 90% inabsence of light (dark condition). As seen in Table II, the potatoesstored at low temperature of 10° C. and RH of 90% have shown lowmoisture loss compared to the moisture loss in potatoes stored at highertemperature of 25° C. and corresponding RH of 40%. Hence, the potatoesstored at environmental condition of 10° C. and RH of 90% has highershelf life.

As disclosed herein, various attributes defining the shelf-life of fooditem may include, but are not limited to moisture, weight loss,composition (for example, sugar, starch, proteins, fats, vitamins),toxins, sprouting, color and/or flavor. In an experimental setup variousfactors affecting shelf-life of potato included, environmental factorssuch as temperature, humidity, lighting and ventilation;chemicals/preservative (for example, sprout preventing), initialconditions during harvesting (for example, moisture and/or texture afterharvesting); cultivator (for example, Kufri or Atlanta). Variousattributes considered for shelf-life prediction included moisturecontent, water activity, sugar, starch, protein content, andmicroorganisms (Cell count). Various sensory parameters included colour,mould and yeast formation, taste and smell. As described with referenceto FIGS. 8, 9A and 9B, embodiments herein disclose Multistagemulti-order rate kinetics for multiple attribute based shelf lifeestimation. Herein,

$\frac{d\lbrack A\rbrack}{dt} = {k\lbrack A\rbrack}^{n}$$t_{s} = \frac{f\left( \left\lbrack A_{s} \right\rbrack \right)}{k}$

Where, A represents food attribute, n reaction order, k rate constant,and t_(s) shelf life of the food item.

FIG. 11C illustrates variation of cumulative weight loss of potatoeswith number of days, in accordance with the example scenario. Asillustrated in FIG. 11C, in a weight loss study conducted for thepotatoes, the potatoes inside the enclosure have shown higher weightloss initially but later stabilized.

FIG. 11D illustrates experimental and predicted shelf life based on theweight loss data, in accordance with the example scenario.

FIG. 11E illustrates rate kinetic models for potatoes stored atdifferent environmental conditions, in accordance with the examplescenario.

FIG. 11F illustrates shelf life prediction at different storageconditions on the basis of weight loss data, in accordance with theexample scenario.

FIG. 11G illustrates second order rate kinetics for Jyoti variety(cultivar) of potatoes, in accordance with the example scenario. At sametemperature but different humidity conditions.

FIG. 11H illustrates Arrhenius type equation to capture humiditydependence on weight loss for a variety (Jyoti) of potatoes, inaccordance with the example scenario. In an embodiment, theArrhenius-type equation for weight loss is:

$W = \frac{Wo}{\left( {1 + \left( {{Wo} \times {Ko} \times d \times e^{\frac{m}{H}}} \right)} \right)}$

-   -   Herein W is predicted weight, W₀ is initial weight, K₀-        pre-exponential factor, d-number of days, m is constant        (specific to cultivars), and H is relative humidity.

In order to capture the effect of relative humidity, the rate kineticmodels are developed for each of the plurality of post-harvest lifecycle stages of the food. This model comprises one or more parameterscalculated using Arrhenius type equation. The Arrhenius type equationhas parameters comprising a pre-exponential factor (K0), cultivar(variety) specific constant (m). These parameters are calculated usingthe time-series data at a plurality of distinct relative humidity. Theequation stands for constant temperature. FIG. 11H illustrates anexample for estimating parameters of Arrhenius type equation at 25° C.Same approach can be useful for different temperatures.

FIG. 11I illustrates an example of shelf life attribute for variousstorage conditions, in accordance with the example scenario. This can beused as a lookup table for predicting shelf life depending upon thespecific food attribute required for specific application. This can bealso used for predicting the minimum shelf life comparing all the foodattributes.

Various embodiments disclosed herein provides method and system formonitoring and quality evaluation of perishable food items. Saidmonitoring and quality evaluation facilitates in determining shelf-life(or remaining shelf-life of the food items). Freshness of perishablefood items and/or shelf-life thereof is determined as a function of manymultivariate, mutually exclusive varying parameters via a networkedframework. The system enables developing continuous controlledmonitoring technique by recreating the environmental conditions presentat source, during transit or storage, in the custom enclosed chamber topredict freshness of perishable food items at source, during transit andstorage. The disclosed framework may be able of controlling theenvironmental conditions in the enclosed chamber containing food item tomaintain the favorable conditions surrounding the food items.

An important contribution of the disclosed embodiments is determinationof freshness of the food item in quantitative terms. In an embodiment,the quantitative determination of freshness of the food items is basedon receipt of sensor data as well as visual data pertaining to the fooditems. In an embodiment, inclusion of visual contents using CNNsfine-tuning (described with reference to FIGS. 6, 7A-7C) providesupdated visual embedding of the food item, which is a vectorizedrepresentation of the food item that depicts visual freshnesscharacteristics thereof. In an embodiment, the disclosed system can beused to develop Internet of Things (IOT) platform, in which thesynchronized data output obtained at specified intervals can beinterfaced with cloud/Personal Computer (PC). The quantified data can bedisplayed on a mobile screen, iPad, tablets and so on, throughcloud/Wi-Fi module/gsm-module. In another embodiment, a rate kineticbased model (described with reference to FIGS. 8-11I) is utilized fordetermining reaction rate order of the food item at a particularpost-harvest stage of the food item so as to determine the remainingshelf life thereof.

The illustrated steps are set out to explain the exemplary embodimentsshown, and it should be anticipated that ongoing technologicaldevelopment will change the manner in which particular functions areperformed. These examples are presented herein for purposes ofillustration, and not limitation. Further, the boundaries of thefunctional building blocks have been arbitrarily defined herein for theconvenience of the description. Alternative boundaries can be defined solong as the specified functions and relationships thereof areappropriately performed. Alternatives (including equivalents,extensions, variations, deviations, etc., of those described herein)will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art(s) based on theteachings contained herein. Such alternatives fall within the scope ofthe disclosed embodiments. Also, the words “comprising,” “having,”“containing,” and “including,” and other similar forms are intended tobe equivalent in meaning and be open ended in that an item or itemsfollowing any one of these words is not meant to be an exhaustivelisting of such item or items, or meant to be limited to only the listeditem or items. It must also be noted that as used herein and in theappended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include pluralreferences unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.

Furthermore, one or more computer-readable storage media may be utilizedin implementing embodiments consistent with the present disclosure. Acomputer-readable storage medium refers to any type of physical memoryon which information or data readable by a processor may be stored.Thus, a computer-readable storage medium may store instructions forexecution by one or more processors, including instructions for causingthe processor(s) to perform steps or stages consistent with theembodiments described herein. The term “computer-readable medium” shouldbe understood to include tangible items and exclude carrier waves andtransient signals, i.e., be non-transitory. Examples include randomaccess memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), volatile memory,nonvolatile memory, hard drives, CD ROMs, DVDs, flash drives, disks, andany other known physical storage media.

It is intended that the disclosure and examples be considered asexemplary only, with a true scope of disclosed embodiments beingindicated by the following claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A processor implemented method, comprising:obtaining a rate kinetic data associated with a food item enclosed in anetworked framework, via one or more hardware processors, wherein therate kinetic data comprises a time-series data having a plurality ofattributes indicative of freshness of the food item; selectivelypartitioning the rate kinetic data into a plurality of post-harvestlifecycle stages of the food item based on a reaction rate orderassociated with one or more time intervals of each of the plurality ofpost-harvest lifecycle stages, via the one or more hardware processors,wherein the reaction rate order associated with the one or more timeintervals of each of the plurality of post-harvest lifecycle stages isdetermined by a trained rate kinetic model; estimating, based at leaston the reaction rate order associated with the one or more timeintervals and the plurality of attributes, a plurality of values ofshelf-life of the food item during each of the one or more timeintervals, via the one or more hardware processors; aggregating a set ofvalues of the shelf-life from amongst the plurality of values of theshelf-life corresponding to each attribute of the plurality ofattributes, via the one or more hardware processors; and selecting, fromamongst the set of values of the shelf-life, a minimum value ofshelf-life as the food freshness value of the food item, via the one ormore hardware processors.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the ratekinetic data comprises at least a sensory data associated with the fooditem.
 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising iteratively fittingtraining data on to reaction rate equations to obtain the trained ratekinetic model for the food item.
 4. The method of claim 1, furthercomprising determining the plurality of post-harvest life cycle stagesof the food item by selectively partitioning the input data into theplurality of post-harvest life cycle stages of the food item, whereindetermining a post-harvest life cycle stage of the plurality ofpost-harvest life cycle stages comprises: converting the time-seriesdata into an integrated form of zero, first and second order ratereaction equations in a sequential order to obtain a plot of rate ofchange of concentration terms associated with the integral form of thetrained rate kinetic model; obtaining a value of coefficient ofdetermination from the plot of integral form of the zero, first andsecond order reactions in the sequential order; and determining theorder of reaction based on a comparison of the value of the coefficientof determination with a threshold value of the coefficient ofdetermination, wherein, the order of the reaction is indicative of anature of reaction responsible for biochemical changes in the food itemduring the post-harvest lifecycle stage of the food item.
 5. The methodof claim 4, wherein the trained rate kinetic model for each of theplurality of post-harvest life cycle stages of the food item comprisesone or more rate kinetic parameters, further wherein the one or morerate kinetic parameters comprises a Preexponential factor (KO) and anactivation energy (E), further wherein the one or more rate kineticparameters are calculated using the time-series data at a plurality ofdistinct temperatures.
 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the trainedrate kinetic model for each of the plurality of post-harvest life cyclestages of the food item comprises one or more parameters calculatedusing Arrhenius type equation, further wherein the Arrhenius typeequation comprises parameters for capturing an effect of relativehumidity on the attribute, further wherein the one or more parameters ofthe Arrhenius-type equation comprises a pre-exponential factor (K0), acultivar specific constant (m), and further wherein the one or moreparameters are calculated using the time-series data at a plurality ofdistinct relative humidity values.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein therate kinetic data comprises a sensory data associated with the fooditem, and wherein the rate kinetic data comprises weight of the fooditem, weight loss of the food item, moisture content in the food item,moisture loss during the storage, concentration of specific compound inthe food item, and concentration of specific gas such as Carbon dioxide(CO2), ethylene (C2H4,), ammonia (NH3) released by the food item.
 8. Themethod of claim 6, wherein the rate kinetic data further comprisesvisual data associated with the food item
 9. The method of claim 7,wherein obtaining the rate kinetic data comprises collecting at leastone of the visual data and the sensory data using at least one ofinvasive techniques and non-invasive techniques, the invasive techniquescomprises use of one or more laboratory techniques to calculate foodcompositional parameters including at least one of sugar, starch, fat,protein, vitamins and antioxidants, and the non-invasive techniquescomprises at least one of a plurality of non-invasive sensors, theplurality of non-invasive sensors comprises gas sensors, acoustics,optical sensors, and near infrared sensor.
 10. A system (300)comprising: one or more memories (304); and one or more hardwareprocessors (302), the one or more memories (304) coupled to the one ormore hardware processors (302), wherein the one or more hardwareprocessors (302) are configured to execute programmed instructionsstored in the one or more memories (304), to: obtain a rate kinetic dataassociated with a food item enclosed in a networked framework, whereinthe rate kinetic data comprises a time-series data having a plurality ofattributes indicative of freshness of the food item; selectivelypartition the rate kinetic data into a plurality of post-harvestlifecycle stages of the food item based on a reaction rate orderfollowed in one or more time intervals of each of the plurality ofpost-harvest lifecycle stages, wherein the reaction rate orderassociated with one or more time intervals of each of the plurality ofpost-harvest lifecycle stages is determined by a trained rate kineticmodel; estimate, based at least on the reaction rate order associatedwith the one or more time intervals and the plurality of attributes, aplurality of values of shelf-life of the food item during each of theone or more time intervals; aggregate a set of values of the shelf-lifefrom amongst the plurality of values of the shelf-life corresponding toeach attribute of the plurality of attributes; and select, from amongstthe set of values of the shelf-life, a minimum value of shelf-life asthe food freshness value of the food item.
 11. The system of claim 10,wherein the rate kinetic data comprises at least a sensory dataassociated with the food item.
 12. The system of claim 10, wherein theone or more hardware processors are further configured to by theinstructions to determine the plurality of post-harvest life cyclestages of the food item, and wherein to determine the plurality ofpost-harvest life cycle stages, the one or more hardware processors arefurther configured to by the instructions to selectively partition theinput data into the plurality of post-harvest life cycle stages of thefood item, further wherein to determine a post-harvest life cycle stageof the plurality of post-harvest life cycle stages, the one or morehardware processors are further configured to by the instructions to:convert the time-series data into an integrated form of zero, first andsecond order rate reaction equations in a sequential order to obtain aplot of rate of change of concentration terms associated with theintegral form of the trained rate kinetic model; obtain a value ofcoefficient of determination from the plot of integral form of the zero,first and second order reactions in the sequential order; and determinethe order of reaction based on a comparison of the value of thecoefficient of determination with a threshold value of the coefficientof determination, wherein, the order of the reaction is indicative of anature of reaction responsible for biochemical changes in the food itemduring the post-harvest lifecycle stage of the food item.
 13. The systemof claim 10, wherein the trained rate kinetic model for each of theplurality of post-harvest life cycle stages of the food item comprisesone or more kinetic parameters, further wherein the one or more ratekinetic parameters comprises a Preexponential factor (K0) and anactivation energy (E), further wherein the one or more rate kineticparameters are calculated using the time-series data at a plurality ofdistinct temperatures.
 14. The system of claim 13, wherein the trainedrate kinetic model for each of the plurality of post-harvest life cyclestages of the food item comprises one or more parameters calculatedusing Arrhenius type equation, further wherein the Arrhenius typeequation comprises parameters for capturing an effect of relativehumidity on the attribute, further wherein the one or more parameters ofthe Arrhenius-type equation comprises a pre-exponential factor (K0), acultivar specific constant (m), and further wherein the one or moreparameters are calculated using the time-series data at a plurality ofdistinct relative humidity values.
 15. The system of claim 14, whereinthe one or more hardware processors are further configured by theinstructions to iteratively fit training data on to reaction rateequations to obtain the trained rate kinetic model for the food item.16. The system of claim 10, wherein the rate kinetic data comprises asensory data associated with the food item, and wherein the rate kineticdata comprises weight of the food item, weight loss of the food item,moisture content in the food item, moisture loss during the storage,concentration of specific compound in the food item, and concentrationof specific gas such as Carbon dioxide (CO2), ethylene (C2H4,), ammonia(NH3) released by the food item.
 17. The system of claim 15, wherein therate kinetic data further comprises visual data associated with the fooditem.
 18. The system of claim 16, wherein to obtain the rate kineticdata, the one or more hardware processors are further configured by theinstructions to collect at least one of the visual data and the sensorydata using at least one of invasive techniques and non-invasivetechniques, the invasive techniques comprises use of one or morelaboratory techniques to calculate food compositional parametersincluding at least one of sugar, starch, fat, protein, vitamins andantioxidants, and the non-invasive techniques comprises at least one ofa plurality of non-invasive sensors, the plurality of non-invasivesensors comprises gas sensors, acoustics, optical sensors, and nearinfrared sensor.
 19. One or more non-transitory machine readableinformation storage mediums comprising one or more instructions whichwhen executed by one or more hardware processors cause: obtaining a ratekinetic data associated with a food item enclosed in a networkedframework, via one or more hardware processors, wherein the rate kineticdata comprises a time-series data having a plurality of attributesindicative of freshness of the food item; selectively partitioning therate kinetic data into a plurality of post-harvest lifecycle stages ofthe food item based on a reaction rate order associated with one or moretime intervals of each of the plurality of post-harvest lifecyclestages, via the one or more hardware processors, wherein the reactionrate order associated with the one or more time intervals of each of theplurality of post-harvest lifecycle stages is determined by a trainedrate kinetic model; estimating, based at least on the reaction rateorder associated with the one or more time intervals and the pluralityof attributes, a plurality of values of shelf-life of the food itemduring each of the one or more time intervals, via the one or morehardware processors; aggregating a set of values of the shelf-life fromamongst the plurality of values of the shelf-life corresponding to eachattribute of the plurality of attributes, via the one or more hardwareprocessors; and selecting, from amongst the set of values of theshelf-life, a minimum value of shelf-life as the food freshness value ofthe food item, via the one or more hardware processors.